BELGIAN AND FRENCH VIEWS OF EUROPEAN GAMBLING REGULATION Thibault

Belgian and French views of European gambling regulation (2) The ECJ case-law  Schindler, Zenatti and Läärä cases ( ): restrictions ok if Non discriminatory Justified by imperative reasons of general interest: to curb harmful effects of gambling Necessary and proportionate: must guarantee the achievement of the objective pursued and not go beyond what is necessary.
Belgian and French views of European gambling regulation  General conclusions Ambivalent role of the French state: public funds vs morality of gaming services ► no consistent gaming policy no single public authority competent to monitor the sector no public program to counter the negative consequences of compulsive gambling ► no responsible gaming policy Complaints lodged to the European Commission by Maltese bookmakers against French State Belgium: partial and abstract application of Gambelli Belgium willing to open up market to online private operators, not France: exclusivity of FDJ & PMU Complaints lodged to the European Commission by German firm against Belgian National Lottery Pressure growing on both MS to open market, Belgium more compliant with EU law requirements

Lewis Hine

The Bonnot Gang The Anarchist Library

Eig13 12pp Brochure Webbro Ffv

Order MR K'S LIQUOR - Torrance, CA Menu Delivery [Menu & Prices]

The Garden City News (11/10/23) by Litmor Publishing - Issuu

Breaking And Entering Your guide to Milwaukee music

30 facts about Luxembourg you might not know

Sports Spectrum Podcast

Team Arkéa Samsic

The Regulation of Gambling: European and National Perspectives